Ronald Allen Smith height - How tall is Ronald Allen Smith?

Ronald Allen Smith was born on 7 September, 1957 in Red Deer, Canada, is a Canadian murderer on death row in the U.S.. At 63 years old, Ronald Allen Smith height not available right now. We will update Ronald Allen Smith's height soon as possible.

Now We discover Ronald Allen Smith's Biography, Age, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is He in this year and how He spends money? Also learn how He earned most of net worth at the age of 65 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Ronald Allen Smith Age 65 years old
Zodiac Sign Virgo
Born 7 September 1957
Birthday 7 September
Birthplace Red Deer, Canada
Nationality Canada

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 7 September. He is a member of famous Murderer with the age 65 years old group.

Ronald Allen Smith Weight & Measurements

Physical Status
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Ronald Allen Smith Net Worth

He net worth has been growing significantly in 2021-22. So, how much is Ronald Allen Smith worth at the age of 65 years old? Ronald Allen Smith’s income source is mostly from being a successful Murderer. He is from Canada. We have estimated Ronald Allen Smith's net worth , money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2022 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2022 Under Review
Net Worth in 2021 Pending
Salary in 2021 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income Murderer

Ronald Allen Smith Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook Ronald Allen Smith Facebook
Wikipedia Ronald Allen Smith Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

2014

Smith refused a plea deal that would have seen him avoid death row but spend his life in prison. He pleaded guilty three weeks later and then asked for — and was given — a death sentence. Later he changed his mind. Smith has had several previous execution dates, but each has been overturned. In November 2001 the United States Supreme Court denied a petition for review and in 2010 The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his final appeal and the case was sent back to the State of Montana for another date for execution.

2009

Counsel for Smith launched a proceeding in Canada's Federal Court against the cabinet ministers responsible for the change in Canada's policy. In a decision rendered on March 4, 2009, Mr. Justice Barnes found that the Canadian government did not have a coherent new policy on seeking clemency in death-penalty cases and therefore the government was required to apply the former policy to Smith's case. The court did not determine whether there is, generally, a legal duty on the government to help its citizens sentenced to death abroad; rather, the court based its decision on issues of procedural fairness, holding that before withdrawing support of Smith's clemency application, the government had a duty to consult fully with Smith and his legal advisors, followed by a fair and objective consideration of the appropriateness of applying any new policy to the facts of his case. In the result, the court ordered the Government of Canada to "take all reasonable steps to support [Smith's] case for clemency before the governor of Montana and his advisors in accordance with the current government policy."

The government did not appeal the ruling of the Federal Court, and on June 19, 2009, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon said that the government is complying with the court ruling. Earlier the same day, Cannon explained the government's policy as follows: "Our government respects the decisions made by sovereign, democratic states. We are determined to ensure that justice is served for Canadians abroad. In that regard, we will continue to study each instance on a case by case basis and, where appropriate, seek clemency for Canadians facing the death penalty abroad."

2007

In October/November 2007, however, the government of Canada announced that it would not seek clemency for Smith. Whereas Canadian government policy had always been to seek clemency through diplomatic channels for Canadians sentenced to death in foreign countries, the government now announced a new policy: "that multiple murderers and mass murderers who are convicted in a democracy that adheres to the rule of law cannot necessarily count on a plea for clemency from the Canadian government and patriation back to this country." As of 2010, Smith remained on Montana's death row.

1997

In 1997, Canadian consular officials requested clemency for Smith on humanitarian grounds and the governor of Montana apparently showed some sympathy to these requests.

1983

Smith, who is from Wetaskiwin, Alberta, was sentenced to death in March 1983, after he himself asked for the death penalty after his conviction. Seven months earlier, he along with an accomplice, who were both under the influence of LSD, killed two Native American men who offered them a ride while hitchhiking. They marched cousins Harvey Mad Man, 23, and Thomas Running Rabbit, 20, into the woods by the highway and shot them both in the head with a sawn-off .22-calibre rifle.

The Government of Canada had maintained an interest in Smith's case since 1983, with Canadian consular officials communicating with some regularity with Smith, with his lawyers, with prison officials, with the Office of the Governor of Montana, with other Montana state officials, and with the U.S. Department of State.

1957

Ronald Allen Smith (born September 7, 1957) is a Canadian man who was sentenced to death in Montana for murdering two people. As of 2019, Smith is one of two prisoners on Montana's death row (the other is William Gollehon). Judge Jeffrey Sherlock granted Smith a stay of execution so his civil lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of lethal injection could be decided.